Jannatul Ferdousi
Department of Nutrition & Food Engineering, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Daffodil International University, Daffodil Smart City (DSC), Savar, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh,
Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail-1902, Bangladesh
Sazzadur Rahman Sagor
Department of Nutrition & Food Engineering, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Daffodil International University, Daffodil Smart City (DSC), Savar, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh,
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Daffodil International University, Daffodil Smart City (DSC), Savar, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh
Nandine Datta
Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail-1902, Bangladesh
Tusar Imran
Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail-1902, Bangladesh
Luthfunnesa Bari
Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail-1902, Bangladesh
Recent advancements in poultry farming have significantly increased the use of antibiotics for disease prevention and growth promotion, a trend that has raised urgent concerns about antibiotic resistance (AR) stemming from overuse. In contrast, probiotics and vitamin supplements commonly added to poultry feed or drinking water provide robust natural alternatives that effectively enhance poultry health and productivity without contributing to AR. This cross-sectional study, conducted between January 2020 to July 2022, thoroughly assessed the knowledge and usage patterns of antibiotics, probiotics, and vitamin supplements among poultry farmers in 25 commercial farms across Tangail District, Bangladesh.
Among the 25 broiler farms surveyed, a clear trend emerged: 72% of farmers relied solely on antibiotics, 8% used only probiotics, and 20% utilised a combination of both. Notably, among the probiotic users (n = 7), an impressive 71% employed probiotics as growth promoters, while 29% leveraged them for disease prevention. The study identified six commonly used probiotics: Biogut, Enprovin-Plus, Probios, Fra-C-12, Prozime, and Avi-Bac. Additionally, five effective vitamin supplements, Megavit, UK-GP-Plus, Vitamin AD-3-E, Eskavit AD-E, and AD-3-E-Super were frequently utilised, especially for promoting growth.
Statistical analysis demonstrated a substantial reduction in disease prevalence among probiotic users compared to their non-user counterparts. For instance, the incidence of blood dysentery was only 13.3% among probiotic users, in stark contrast to 86.7% among non-users. Similarly, Ranikhet virus infections affected 22.2% of probiotic users compared to 78.8% of non-users, while E. coli infections were reported at just 25.0% in probiotic users versus 75.0% in non-users. These compelling differences reinforce the strong association between probiotics and improved flock health in commercial poultry farming, confirming their potential as a safe, effective alternative to antibiotics. The benefits of probiotics extend beyond just disease prevention; they also enhance growth performance and improve meat quality in broilers.
Probiotics, Vitamins, Antibiotic resistance, Growth promoter, Poultry feed.
Al-Zubayer, M. A., Ahammed, B., Sarder, M. A., Kundu, S., Majumder, U. K., & Islam, S. M. S. (2021). Double and triple burden of non-communicable diseases and its determinants among adults in Bangladesh: Evidence from a recent demographic and health survey. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14613
Ali, M., Amin, M. R., Jarl, J., & Saha, S. (2024). Prevalence, trends, and inequality in noncommunicable diseases in Bangladesh: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys 2011 and 2017–2018. Public Health Challenges, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.148
Ali, M. K., Bhaskarapillai, B., Shivashankar, R., Mohan, D., Fatmi, Z. A., Pradeepa, R., Masood Kadir, M., Mohan, V., Tandon, N., Venkat Narayan, K. M., & Prabhakaran, D. (2016). Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk in urban South Asia: The CARRS Study. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 23(4), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315580891
Biswas, T., Townsend, N., Islam, M. S., Islam, M. R., Das Gupta, R., Das, S. K., & Mamun, A. Al. (2019). Association between socioeconomic status and prevalence of non-communicable diseases risk factors and comorbidities in Bangladesh: Findings from a nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open, 9(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025538
Hatice, Ağralı, & Akyar, İ. (2022). The effect of health literacy-based, health belief-constructed education on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study. Primary Care Diabetes, 16(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2021.12.010
Miranda, J. J., Barrientos-Gutiérrez, T., Corvalan, C., Hyder, A. A., Lazo-Porras, M., Oni, T., & Wells, J. C. K. (2019). Understanding the rise of cardiometabolic diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Nature Medicine, 25(11), 1667–1679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0644-7
Nair, T. (2021). More Than Skin Color: Ethnicity-Specific BMI Cutoffs For Obesity Based on Type 2 Diabetes Risk in England. American College of Cardiology. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2021/10/18/15/35/More-Than-Skin-Color
Nie, J. X., & Ardern, C. I. (2014). Association between obesity and cardiometabolic health risk in Asian-Canadian sub-groups. PLoS ONE, 9(9), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107548
Rao, G. H. (2018). Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Global Perspective. Journal of Cardiology & Cardiovascular Therapy, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.19080/jocct.2018.12.555834
Reiter-Brennan, C., Dzaye, O., Davis, D., Blaha, M., & Eckel, R. H. (2021). Comprehensive Care Models for Cardiometabolic Disease. Current Cardiology Reports, 23(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01450-1
Resolution on Poverty and Socioeconomic Status. (2022). American Psychological Association.
Singh-Manoux, A., Fayosse, A., Sabia, S., Tabak, A., Shipley, M., Dugravot, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2018). Clinical, socioeconomic, and behavioural factors at age 50 years and risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and mortality: A cohort study. PLoS Medicine, 15(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002571
Sung, K., Lee, S. H., & Lim, S. (2025). Beyond Body Mass Index: New Criteria for a Holistic Approach to Clinical Obesity. Diabetes and Metabolism Journal, 49(2), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2025.0097
Wu, K., Qi, X., Li, A., Dong, H., Wang, X., & Ji, M. (2025). Association of Health Information Literacy and Health Outcomes Among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome. Nursing Reports, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030090
Yukiko Wagatsuma, R. R. E. A. A. K. R. M. A. H. O. S. von E. S. A. M. V. E.-C. E. M. K. (2021). A longitudinal study of rural Bangladeshi children with long-term arsenic and cadmium exposures and biomarkers of cardiometabolic diseases. Environmental Pollution, 271(ISSN 0269-7491), 116333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116333